Ideal for GNOME user with limited hardware capabilityIdeal for GNOME user with limited hardware capabilityby Anonymous on Jul 24, 2001Xfce integration with GNOME is remarquable. I've been using it for the last 24 hours (and I mean 24 hours!) and there isn't a single reason for me to go back to the resource hungry GNOME desktop.
It is a pleasure to browse my hard drive and CDs from X rather than the console again. gmc and nautilus killed the desktop. Long live the desktop... thanks to xfTree and xfce as a whole!
Highly recommended *****
rogue@shadowkeep.co.uk
Back to XFce
| XFce | Anonymous | Apr 18, 2004 | | A Truly Great Desktop | Anonymous | Dec 08, 2002 | | XFce | Anonymous | Jun 24, 2002 | | XFce 3 | Anonymous | Jun 09, 2002 | | It's almost all that I wanted. | Anonymous | Apr 02, 2002 | | XFCE is best of the best out there | Anonymous | Mar 04, 2002 | | Configuration | Anonymous | Jan 31, 2002 | | Forget the windoze desktop! | Anonymous | Jan 21, 2002 | | XFce | Anonymous | Jan 15, 2002 | | If you haven't yet experienced it take a look | Anonymous | Aug 24, 2001 | | XFCE | Anonymous | Jul 27, 2001 | | Ideal for GNOME user with limited hardware capability | Anonymous | Jul 24, 2001 | | You don't need Gnome or KDE ;) | Anonymous | Jun 13, 2001 | | Os/2 wps look | Anonymous | May 03, 2001 | | Seriously Fast | Anonymous | Apr 19, 2001 | | XFce | Anonymous | Dec 17, 2000 | | Maximized windows | Anonymous | Dec 11, 2000 | | Xfce | Anonymous | Nov 08, 2000 | | XFce - try it! | Anonymous | Nov 07, 2000 | | XFce is awesome... | Anonymous | Oct 29, 2000 | | Cool. Looks a lot like WPS ;-) | Anonymous | Sep 29, 2000 | | XFce | Anonymous | Apr 16, 2000 | | XFce Comment | schabi | Oct 07, 1999 |
| |
Free eBook: 
